<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR has its own shoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lukearmour.com/2006/02/10/pr-has-its-own-shoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lukearmour.com/2006/02/10/pr-has-its-own-shoes/</link>
	<description>Luke Armour gives you the rundown on digital communication, Public Relations, and Marketing with special podcast guests.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://lukearmour.com/2006/02/10/pr-has-its-own-shoes/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://armourpr.wordpress.com/2006/02/10/pr-has-its-own-shoes/#comment-30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke and I love this debate...
And I would like to add my bit...
I, like you, hate the misnomer that PR=Just Publicity, Just press conferences, good image and reputation.  It&#039;s superficial.  And also, why does PR become a guest, a distant cousin, in an organization&#039;s hierarchy subservient to the Marketing department.  I don&#039;t think an organization obtains a stellar reputation from media coverage alone or from avante garde advertisements. It&#039;s the strategy.   Every organization needs PR because it ties the organization to the community and gives it a voice. Also, every organization needs marketing.  I posit that marketing and PR can be shared in strategy. Some campaign aspects call for PR functions and others marketing.  But I think advertising is struggling because consumers have stopped listening and media use has changed so much advertisers have not found the right formula in a multimedia-use consumer environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke and I love this debate&#8230;<br />
And I would like to add my bit&#8230;<br />
I, like you, hate the misnomer that PR=Just Publicity, Just press conferences, good image and reputation.  It&#8217;s superficial.  And also, why does PR become a guest, a distant cousin, in an organization&#8217;s hierarchy subservient to the Marketing department.  I don&#8217;t think an organization obtains a stellar reputation from media coverage alone or from avante garde advertisements. It&#8217;s the strategy.   Every organization needs PR because it ties the organization to the community and gives it a voice. Also, every organization needs marketing.  I posit that marketing and PR can be shared in strategy. Some campaign aspects call for PR functions and others marketing.  But I think advertising is struggling because consumers have stopped listening and media use has changed so much advertisers have not found the right formula in a multimedia-use consumer environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

